Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Lawrence Durrell: Pope Joan

Lawrence Durrell:  Pope Joan
translated and adapted from the Greek of Emmanuel Royidis. 



Brief  quotation from the Wikipedia article on Pope Joan

"Pope Joan (Ioannes Anglicus) was, according to popular legend, a woman who reigned as pope for a few years during the Middle Ages. Her story first appeared in chronicles in the 13th century and subsequently spread throughout Europe. The story was widely believed for centuries, but most modern scholars regard it as fictional.

Most versions of her story describe her as a talented and learned woman who disguised herself as a man, often at the behest of a lover. In the most common accounts, due to her abilities, she rose through the church hierarchy and was eventually elected pope. Her sex was revealed when she gave birth during a procession, and she died shortly after, either through murder or natural causes. The accounts state that later church processions avoided this spot, and that the Vatican removed the female pope from its official lists and crafted a ritual to ensure that future popes were male.  In the 16th century, Sienna Cathedral featured a bust of Joan among other pontiffs; this was removed after protests in 1600."



From the Catholic Encyclopedia: 
 
The fable about a female pope, who afterwards bore the name of Johanna (Joan), is first noticed in the middle of the thirteenth century.The Catholic Encyclopedia lists a number of variations on this legend at this address:

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08407a.htm



From the Wikipedia article on Emmanuel Royidis:

"In 1866 Rhoides published a controversial novel, The Papess Joanne ( Ἡ Πάπισσα Ἰωάννα), an exploration of the legend of Pope Joan, a supposed female pope who reigned some time in the ninth or tenth century (which was in fact a time of great turmoil for the papacy). Though a romantic novel with satirical overtones, Rhoides asserted it contained conclusive evidence that Pope Joan truly existed and that the Catholic Church had been attempting to cover up the fact for centuries.
The book's scathing attacks on what he viewed as an uneducated, uncultured, superstitious and backward clergy were controversial, and led to Rhoides's excommunication from the Greek Orthodox Church which perceived that its own clergy was the real target of those attacks."


Now, to the novel:

The narrator at the beginning of Part Three, approximately half way through the work states that "good Christians loathe those who mix religion  for the sake of profit, with the various inventions of their shaven or sprouting heads; the miracles of irons, pagan gods disguised as saints, genuflections, tickets for Paradise, holy relics, rosaries. . ."  Yet, this is what is found in this work, which is supposed to provide conclusive proof of its claim of a female pope.  Should good Christians, therefore, loathe this work?

The first three parts of the novel tell of her early life, her wanderings with her father,  an itinerant  monk, and the miraculous escapes and events of that time of her life.  This includes a long period in Athens, after she and her lover (a monk) had escaped from the monastery.  At the beginning of Part Four, about 3/4 through the work, the narrator now tells us that everything up to this point has been the product of his imagination, but from this point on everything is based "on the works of eminent chroniclers."

At this point, we are told of her career in Rome, prior to becoming pope, "She also studied medicine and according to some evil tongues she was well acquainted with the principles of witchcraft; it is said that she could force the evil spirits of the day (the former gods Bacchus, Hera, Pan and Aphrodite to leave the gates of darkness and run to do her bidding."  No source is given for this statement, as for most of the other claims in this part of the tale.

We are told of the fabulous natural wonders that followed Joan's election as pope.  Though it was still midsummer, heavy snow fell and blocked the streets of Rome, earthquakes shook Europe, while a rain of blood fell in Bresse and a hail of dead locusts in Normandy.  "Even the owls and night-jars which infested the roofs of the Vatican hooted for three successive nights in the most ominous manner. . ."

Part of the chroniclers's account includes wonders that occurred on her ascension to the throne of Peter, but even here, a footnote suggests that these were borrowed from other accounts of miraculous occurrences at the selection of various popes.  For the most part, this part tells mostly of her love affair with her secretary and personal assistant and little about her activities as pope.

Since I don't read Greek, I have no idea of how much of the book is Royidis and how much is Durrell.  The scathing attacks on the monks and clergy is commented on by critics who were reviewing Royidis's  novel and not Durrell's.  So, that part of the book is probably Royidis' work.

Overall, the tone of the work does not inspire me with great confidence in the argument of a female pope back in the ninth century.  Could there have been a female pope back then?   It's possible, but the complete lack of anything documenting such an event, which should have been shocking, from that time and only appearing some four hundred years later, suggests it's a myth. 

I suspect Lawrence Durrell had as much fun translating and adapting this work as I had in reading it.



10 comments:

  1. maybe LD was a nascent sci fi writer... i think he would have been successful at it...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mudpuddle--strange you should say that. He does have a two book SF set: Tunc and Nunquam.

      If If remember correctly, a man tries to re-create his love by inserting everything he could find about her into a robot? cyborg? android? It's been years since I read it, so I may be wrong here. They definitely are SF, though. I've decided I will reread them soon.

      Delete
  2. I agree that it is unlikely that Pope Joan ever existed. With that, the novel sounds so interesting and worth thew read. It is such an intriguing story that I wish that it were true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian Joseph--I agree--so far no concrete information. But, it would be fun to find evidence that it is true. After all, the Church came to no disastrous harm during the reign of Pope John IX (I think), who supposedly was really Pope Joan.

      Delete
  3. In Stendhal's Roman Journal, he gives a detailed account of Pope Joan. Given that he also gives an eyewitness account of the announcement of Pius VIII's election--an event that occurred when he was in Paris, and had not for many years been to Rome--I did not take this seriously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. George--I probably wouldn't take it too seriously either. Reminds me of Ford Madox Ford's comment when someone questioned his account of an event. Ford said he was a novelist, not an historian. At another time when someone disputed his version of the event, Ford replied that it made a better story the way he told it.

      Delete
  4. I guess Durrell thought not highly of the Roman Catholic church. However, of all things you’ve posted about Durrell, this one most intrigues me; the meta-fictional, historical approach (if that’s a fair label) interests me: he uses fiction to explore truth in an historical fiction. Hmmm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. R.T.--from what I gathered from some critical comments, the attitude was really Royidis' and Durrell translated it faithfully. I have no idea of the tone of Royidis novel, but I found Durrell's to be rather light-hearted.

      I wish I knew others who had read the story, so I could find out what overall impression others had received.

      Delete
  5. Hmmm .... sounds interesting .... I think. I started the Alexandria Quartet and could not get into it but this at least is intriguing. On two weird side notes: I don't believe the Orthodox church excommunicates in the same way as the Catholic church in that they still welcome you but you are banned from certain practices (communion, etc.) I can't remember the details though. Also, I've just started to learn Greek .... but ancient Greek so I might not be much help in this case ... ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cleopatra--I know nothing of what excommunication means in the Orthodox Church and remember only a little of its effects in the RC Church, except that it also involves being barred from receiving the sacraments.

      I agree that while learning ancient Greek may be exciting, it probably won't help you that much with reading Royidis' novel. Actually I'm just guessing as I don't know how different ancient and modern Greek are.

      _Pope Joan_ is very much different from The Alexandria Quartet, so there's a good chance you would enjoy it.

      Delete